Multi-omic integration
Connect single-cell, bulk, mutation, repertoire, and clinical data in one oncology study — from molecular profiling through survival analysis and analysis.
Research question
How do TME composition, immune phenotype, mutational features, and signaling patterns combine to explain treatment response and clinical outcomes across my cohort?
Who this is for
- Computational oncology groups supporting multi-modal tumor studies
- Translational teams running correlative analyses on clinical trial biopsies
- Pharma programs integrating sequencing, expression, and outcome endpoints
Data requirements
| Modality | Source | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Single-cell or bulk RNA-seq | Compbio + oncology | TME profiling, immune deconvolution, communication |
| MAF / VCF | Oncology | Mutation landscape, TMB, signatures |
| TCR/BCR repertoire | Oncology | Clonotype and diversity analysis |
| Clinical endpoints | Oncology | Survival, response, recurrence |
| Spatial transcriptomics | Compbio | Spatial TME mapping |
| Whole-slide images | Pathology | Tissue morphology context |
The key integration layer is aligned patient/sample keys across all modalities within one study.
Workflow
Create study → Register samples, endpoints, and datasets
→ TME profiling [compbio]
→ Immune profile + cell communication [oncology]
→ Mutation landscape [oncology]
→ Survival with molecular features [oncology]
→ Multi-modal AI interpretation
Step 1 — Organize the cohort
Create an oncology study with tumor type, stage, and treatment arm metadata. Register all samples with consistent patient_id and external_id keys. Add clinical endpoints for every patient with follow-up data.
See Data upload.
Step 2 — Run molecular pipelines
Execute pipelines appropriate to each modality:
| Modality | Pipeline | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Single-cell | TME composition (compbio-backed) | TME |
| Bulk RNA-seq | Immune profile | Immune |
| Single-cell | Cell-cell communication | Communication |
| MAF | Mutation landscape | Mutations |
Run pipelines in any order; each produces independent artifacts linked to the study run history.
Step 3 — Integrate features for survival
Combine outputs into a feature matrix — TMB, immune phenotype, exhaustion score, CD8 fraction, dominant signature — keyed by patient_id. Launch survival analysis with feature_path and cox_covariates:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/oncology/jobs/survival \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"study_id": "your-study-id",
"parameters": {
"clinical_path": "/path/to/clinical.csv",
"feature_path": "/path/to/multi_omic_features.csv",
"stratify_by": "treatment_arm",
"cox_covariates": ["tmb", "cd8_score", "exhaustion_score"]
}
}'
For longitudinal studies, include a timepoint trajectory file to track biomarker changes across treatment course.
Step 4 — Multi-modal interpretation
Launch interpretation with all completed run IDs:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/oncology/jobs/interpret \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"study_id": "your-study-id",
"parameters": {
"source_run_ids": [
"onco-run-communication",
"onco-run-immune",
"onco-run-mutation",
"onco-run-survival"
],
"interpretation_type": "summary"
}
}'
The interpret pipeline synthesizes findings across communication, immune, mutation, and survival outputs with metric citations.
Expected outputs
- Unified run history with provenance for every pipeline layer
- TME composition, signaling network, immune phenotype, and mutation landscape artifacts
- Survival curves and Cox models with multi-omic covariates
- Integrated AI narrative suitable for translational reports and collaborator review
- Exportable oncoprint, KM curve, and signaling graph data for publications
Example end-to-end scenario
A phase II checkpoint inhibitor trial with pre-treatment biopsies:
- scRNA-seq → TME shows elevated regulatory T cells at the tumor-stroma interface
- Communication → LGALS9-HAVCR2 is the dominant suppressive axis in non-responders
- Immune profile (bulk) → Non-responders classified as immune-excluded with high terminal exhaustion
- Mutation landscape → Low TMB and APOBEC-dominant signature in non-responders
- Survival → TMB and CD8 score independently predict PFS in multivariate Cox model
- Interpret → Grounded summary connecting immune exclusion, suppressive signaling, and low neoantigen burden to IO resistance
Reproducibility
Every step records pipeline version, parameters, and artifact paths. Re-run any layer independently without losing provenance for the full analysis chain.